INDICATIVE PROTOTYPE · figures pending NUMBERS v2.2 sign-off · internal — not for external release
enleashed
Network-awareRebound, top
to feeder
Scoping question

A smart tariff lowers the system peak — so why does it still break the grid? And where?

Logic & data

A network hierarchy System→Primary→Secondary→Feeder→Device; load aggregates up; capacity sized for diversity (ADMD) at each level.

Interface

Watch a day play out: the system stays green while a local feeder lights red. Toggle network-aware coordination to clear it.

Network-aware · every level

Green at the top. Red at the feeder.

Shift every EV to the cheap overnight hour and the system peak actually falls — the national view looks healthier than ever. But diversity is what feeders are built on, and a tariff that makes a street charge in unison collapses it. The breach is local, and invisible from the top. Watch it happen — then coordinate it away.

The network & the tariff

Coordination
EV adoption on the network 70%
System
Primary
Secondary
Worst feeder
healthy <85% tight 85–100% breach >100% EV charging now 00:00
Simulating a day on the network…
What this shows: the same shifted energy that lowers the system peak can create a local feeder peak through loss of diversity — a power/simultaneity problem the energy-level view never sees. Network state is consumed in shadow mode; nothing here dispatches or controls assets. Capacities, ADMD diversity factors and adoption are illustrative, pending NUMBERS v2.2 sign-off.