Anonymised feeder model or portfolio you send ahead of the call; current rule-set you operate under; the segments / customer groups you want compared.
Build the fairness layer with us — shadow-run it on your network first.
We're assembling a consortium around a neutral sandbox that compares market rule-sets against real network physics and fairness before any one is locked in. Bring a feeder model or a policy question; we replicate it in shadow-mode and walk you through what the rules actually do.
For DNOs/DSOs, academics & Catapults, aggregators, and delivery partners — shadow-mode only, white-label; we model and compare, we never operate the grid.
Which rule-set actually delivers — for your feeder, your portfolio, under real network physics?
We replicate it in shadow-mode, compare rule-sets live on the call, and surface coordination-correctness deltas. No GB curtailment magnitude — that figure is [NEEDS-KEY] until NUMBERS sign-off.
Scoping for delivery partners
Where you fit the consortium — delivery partners, aggregators and tooling integrations. We map your inputs to the workstreams already in flight and show the seam where your data, models or operator footprint slot in.
Neutral layer · neutral governance
A neutral layer needs neutral governance — built with the network, regulators and academia, not owned by one player. The consortium is the structural answer to the independence question, and it's how the layer earns the trust to compare rule-sets in the first place.
Prefer a quick scoping chat first?