Policy Sandbox · Lane A
Same assets, different rules — more usable MW.
Test the market rules before they're locked in. Compare four reference rule-sets spanning the 10-lever space against the same assets — each shown as a delta vs No-penalty, so the "better rules → more usable MW" thesis is demonstrated, not asserted. Shadow-mode, no live dispatch.
Gated behind the gaming-validation — we won't recommend a gameable rule to a regulator.
Live toy · illustrative 3×3[ ILLUSTRATIVE · SYNTHETIC ]
baseline = No-penalty · deltas show the current rule-set vs it
RELIABLE MW
[7.6]Δ +0.8 vs No-penalty
FIRM HEADROOM
[8.2]
CURTAILMENT-MW
[4.4]Δ -1.0 vs No-penalty
FAIRNESS · JAIN
[0.95]Δ +0.05
Confidence + fair vs No-penalty, same assets → +0.8 reliable-MW · Jain 0.90→0.95 · -1.0 curtailment-MW. Better rules, more usable MW — illustrative.
£ VALUE THROUGH FLEX · illustrative band
[ ~£ low–high / yr · archetype-gated ]
[ ] = illustrative placeholder — real figures land on partner data after two-signature sign-off. Coordination-correctness only — no GB curtailment magnitude (F1).
1 · proves now
0 breaches, Jain≈1 on real OpenDSS limits
2 · your dials
pick a rule-preset + a portfolio archetype
3 · unlock
send feeder models → shadow run on your network
Run this on your network.
Send anonymised feeder models → a 2-week shadow replication on your real feeders.