Research inputs
NESO balancing & constraint costs · ESO whole-system flex benefit · CP30 target · DFS performance data · DESNZ Clean Flexibility Roadmap.
How big is the coordination pool, how does it move across 2026 → 2030, and how much of it is realistic to capture under different worlds?
NESO balancing & constraint costs · ESO whole-system flex benefit · CP30 target · DFS performance data · DESNZ Clean Flexibility Roadmap.
Five sourced pools sized at three horizons (2026 / 2027 / 2030); five scenario stress tests; portfolio-coverage overlay shows the realistic enleashed slice.
Most value maps quote one big number for one year and stop. This one shows five distinct value pools moving across three horizons (2026 → 2030), stress-tested under five scenarios, with a portfolio-coverage overlay showing the slice Enleashed can realistically address.
| Quantity | Value | Source & method |
|---|---|---|
| Balancing — 2024/25 | £2.7bn published | NESO 2025 Annual Balancing Costs Report (£1.7bn constraints + balancing services). |
| Constraints — 2024/25 | £1.7bn published | NESO 2025 — constraint payment subset of balancing. |
| Whole-system flex benefit | £3.2–4.7bn/yr published | National Grid ESO 2022 — high-flex integration scenario. |
| EV-tariff customer benefit | £540/yr measured | Enleashed MVP backtest, 33 LV feeders, 2025. |
| AU coordination uplift (peer ref.) | 34% [AU] published | CSIRO trial — peer-reviewed; GB replication in progress; never stated as GB. |
| Realistic coverage 2030 | 60% indicative | Enleashed analysis — share moveable post-DSI MVP + retail engagement. |
| GB curtailment magnitude | [NEEDS-KEY] synthetic | F1 rule: no GB curtailment magnitude on this surface; index change only. |